Why does Dan Aquilante have a job?
In a typically godawful review of Michael, Aquilante shamed himself yet again.
“…But it is Michael Jackson’s best album in years” Danny boy claims.
Lets’s have a look at MJ’s entire output this millennium
2001: “Invincible”
2009: “This Is It”
So does Dan mean Michael is better than This Is It or does he mean it is better than the nine year old Invincible and This Is It?
If he means the former, why say the best in years? why not say better than the last one? And anyway, he gave Is This It a 4 star review and last time I looked, 4 was better than 3. If he means the latter, in one sentence, Dan has a) dismissed his own review from last year and then b) proven himself a fucking disgrace who should be fired.
I’ve only heard four tracks but trust me, Michael isn’t in the same league as Invincible and anybody who thinks it is, particularly if they have a million readers a fucking day, doesn’t deserve their job.